Chicago Suburb Drops Holiday Cross Over Lawsuit Threat
A Wisconsin-based foundation threatened to sue the village over the display of a cross used in Christmas decorations. The Freedom from Religion Foundation said the village's Holiday Cross is "unconstitutional."
A cross traditionally displayed on a water tower in a Chicago suburb won't be put up this year following the threat of a lawsuit from a Wisconsin-based foundation.
For 35 years, the Cook County suburb of Alsip has installed a holiday cross decoration on its West Water Tower. A letter from Mayor Patrick Kitching on the village's website said that this year, the cross won't be on display.
The Wisconsin-based Freedom from Religion Foundation threatened to sue the village over the symbol, Kitching's letter states.
Should religious symbols be allowed on municipal property? Vote in the poll below and tell us in the comments.
"I am very saddened by this and had hoped we would not have to change tradition," Kitching states in the letter. "However in these economic times, the village cannot afford to waste any tax dollars on a lawsuit that simply cannot be won."
A staff attorney from the Freedom from Religion Foundation wrote the Alsip village in December 2011, objecting to a display of a cross on village property. By putting up a Latin cross, Alsip is demonstrating a preference for Christianity over other religions, the organization argues.
The "fundamental principle" of the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment, says the government can't "advance, promote or endorse religion," the foundation's letter states. Displaying the cross demonstrates "government endorsements of Christianity, a blatant violation of the Establishment Clause."
The letter cites cases brought against other municipalities where federal courts supported the idea that a Christian cross is a religious symbol, according to the foundation's letter. It mentions bringing a lawsuit against the Town of Whiteville, Tenn., over a similar matter.
"No court of final resort has ever upheld the government's permanent display of a Christian cross on public land as constitutional," the letter states.
Alsip chose, instead, not to "waste taxpayer dollars to fight a losing battle in court," according to the village's letter.
Click here to see Mayor Kitching's letter.
The water tower cross will be replaced with a different decoration in the future but it wasn't certain to happen in time for Christmas 2012, Kitching writes.
Editor's note: This story inititally ran on Palos Patch, written by Nick Swedberg.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
There are plenty of ways to keep up on Bolingbrook news:
Despiser of Obama
9:40 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Keep the cross up and to hell with the Wisconsin group.
Despiser of Obama
9:42 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
People that don't believe in God , shouldn't celebrate Christmas then. Why? Be Christ is in Christmas.
Jennifer Waldrep
10:16 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Sad just another way our rights are being shoved under the rug while they shovel their beliefs upon us. Who cares what Wisconsin thinks, refuse to stop displaying and allow other religions to display as well.
Jennifer Waldrep
10:16 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
To be mayor you have to have a backbone, maybe they should remember that at the next election.
Jennifer Waldrep
10:18 am on Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Maybe they should use all the cash they use on these bogas law suits to feed the homeless.
Gary
8:58 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012
The 1st Amendment reads, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Notice how all these rights - freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom to assemble are so closely linked, they are included in a single sentence. The US Constitution prohibits Congress from making a law establishing a national religion - like the Anglican Church in England or the Lutheran Church in Germany. There is no federal power here to restrict a local government from freely exercising a religion or freely displaying a religious symbol.
Alloriana Aerin
9:05 am on Wednesday, November 21, 2012
Thank you Gary. VERY well said!!