patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Drew Peterson Gets Date to Fight For New Murder Trial

A two-day hearing was set to determine whether wife-killer Drew Peterson will get another murder trial.

 

Drew Peterson's murder trial lasted 24 days. Now the wife-killer's looking forward to a two-day hearing to see if he gets to do the whole thing over again.

Judge Edward Burmila scheduled the hearing for Feb. 19 and 20. If the judge decides after those two days not give Peterson a new hearing after all, Burmila said he will head straight to sentencing.

Peterson, 59, faces up to 60 years in prison for the March 2004 murder of his third wife,Kathleen Savio. Prosecutors have subpoenaed Peterson's second wife, Victoria Connolly, and one of his five sons, Eric Peterson, to testify against him at the sentencing hearing.

Connolly has said Peterson threatened to kill her and make her death look like an accident. She also told of Drew Peterson holding a gun to her head and breaking into her locked house while she slept. Eric Peterson, who is one of two sons born to Peterson's first wife, Carol Hamilton, testified during a pretrial hearing that he witnessed his father viciously attack Savio.

Prosecutor Marie Czech argued during Thursday's hearing that Peterson's attorneys should not be allowed to call witnesses when they make their case that a new trial is needed.

"They should be required to substantiate their allegations more than they have," Czech said. She also questioned how attorneys Steve Greenberg and Joseph "Shark" Lopez, who defended Peterson at the murder trial, can serve as both his lawyers and as witnesses to the claim he received ineffective counsel.

"We're allowed to act as advocates and witnesses," Lopez said after the hearing, adding, "Obviously Steve can't question himself and I can't ask myself questions."

Attorney David Peilet, who was not working for Peterson during the trial but represents him now, said the key issue in the bid for a new trial was the decision to call Savio's divorce attorney,Harry Smith, to the witness stand. After returning their guilty verdict, several jurors said Smith's testimony convinced them to convict Peterson.

"That probably is the issue that is first and foremost in the public eye," Peilet said. "We saw what verdict it led to."

In what turned out to be a disastrous move, attorney Joel Brodsky called Smith to testify.Brodsky no longer represents Peterson. Greenberg has blamed Brodsky for blowing the case. The allegations of ineffective counsel have all been leveled against Brodsky, who is expected to testify at the February hearing.

Peterson has spent nearly four years in the Will County jail waiting for his case to play out. Cassandra Cales, the sister of Peterson's missing fourth wifeStacy Peterson, attended Thursday's hearing and said life behind bars has not been kind to her brother-in-law.

"I like to see Drew and the effect jail is having on him," Cales said. "Today he was really old looking."

Related Topics: Court, Drew Peterson, Hearing, Jail, Kathleen Savio, Murder, Prison, Stacy Peterson, and Trial

steve

1:18 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013

No one cares Bolingbrook Patch. Please move on to bigger issues. Such as pension funds and ss that may not be there for our grandchildren. Drew Peterson is done. Who cares? Take a poll, I guarantee no one cares about Drew Peterson. End of story. Now that should be you're top news story. No one cares about Drew Peterson's story nor the character actors within this circus act.

Reply

Bob Jamesly

4:24 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013

At least Casandra Cales has some satisfaction after all these years. The murderer who was a prince of Bolingbrook has lost it all. Next thing should be his fat pension.

Reply

john

8:53 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013

I wish they would take his pension. Unfortunately by law they can not. I am a defense attorney who specializes in civil suits. The States attorney has to prove he used his police skills to commit the felony. That is a little tough to prove when there is no direct evidence linking him to the scene of the crime. It would be a whole trial again base upon very little evidence. Simply too hard to prove.

Reply

Stacy

9:28 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013

I hope so John, to me Drew has been alienated by the media since day one. There lucky Drew wasn't psycho. The man is an expert marksman who was on the Bolingbrook swat team. If he wanted to he could take out a small army when he had the chance. One day he will be free because our sixth amendment tells Illinois law otherwise. The fact remains the law dubbed "Drew's Law" was clearly obstructed. It only pertains if the defendant silence the witness. The two hearsay statements that sent Drew to his temporary demise were from Stacy Peterson. A third party statement delivered from a reverend that has his personal confessions done at Starbucks, and a lawyer (like all lawyers) is out for money. Stacy is presumed missing not dead. Therefore you cannot prove Drew silenced the witness, when there is no absolute proof that Stacy is dead. Base upon my constitutional rights I hope Drew Peterson flicks off Glasgow, winning his freedom outright. Maybe he should just flick him off anyways. Lol

Reply

Jim

9:53 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013

I love Drew, he reminds me of a funny Tim Allen. I hope he is freed one day too.

Reply

Kathy

10:50 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013

Drew will get that new trial and win his innocence. We believe in you Drew.

Reply

mandy gibbs

10:14 am on Friday, February 15, 2013

Why on earth would anyone believe a word Mr Peterson says he's a bully to more than women.

Reply

Leave a comment