This guy is such an idiot. ALso, this crew thought they were too cool with their sunglasses on. If I was Drew I would be like lose the sunglasses!!! If your reading this Joe don't wear sunglasses with suit. It is really unprofessional.

Brodski is really a Gorp.

Every thing that Drewfus touches turns into the same thing. He asked for free legal help, and got what he paid for. Yeee Haaaa!

By the way, the entire conviction process of D.P. started with the Family of Kathleen Savio paying for the expensive processes of disenternment, and hiring of Dr. Baaden, and paying for a quality autopsy. Nothing would have happened unless they paid for all of it. And they had no guarantee of success when they did it. Much praise to them as we watch the utter melt down of his defense and former "team".

Brodsky, just realized that this may be his last, and final case. Who'd hire this moron? He needs a meal ticket.
@Bob Jamesly: You're absolutely right about the Savio Family. I'm glad they took the gamble. Dr Baaden is the best at what he does.

So sick of hearing about Drew Peterson and anyone he comes in contact with! RIP to his dead wives.

Ah Peterson! The corrupt BPD should have been replaced from the top to the bottom!
18 or more 911 calls for domestic abuse and not one arrest, can you imagine that happening if it was an ordinary citizen?

Drew Peterson was never corrupt Bill. He was a 29 year police veteran, who was on the swat team, who retired as a sergeant. He is still receiving a pension. So he was never corrupt. The definition of corrupt is having or showing a willingness to act dishonestly in return for money or personal gain. "Showing a willingness", there was no proof this man killed Kathleen Savio for the exception of two third party statements. Statements from a wannabe priest who has confessions told to him by pretty woman in a coffee shop. This is a fact, he has confessions with pretty woman in a coffee shop. The other statement was made by a defense attorney. And we know that all defense attorneys tell the truth right? Give me a break. Even if you believe these people, do you believe the source Stacy Peterson? Is it possible she could've lied to get more money out of a divorce? If this is the case, than there is room for reasonable doubt. Not to mention this stupid law, dubbed Drew's Law, affects our sixth amendment rights. The defendant has the right to be confronted by the witness. The new kangaroo law proposed by that slick hair (I will lie like any other politician to be reelected) Glassgoof is if the defendant had "silenced" the witness. Stacy Peterson is not proclaimed dead just missing, therfore how do you know the defendant silence the witness? With no body it is impossible to prove she is dead. It is just speculation. Just like with Kathleen, it is all speculation.

I have to agree with you Patrick, there was no proof that an articulated jury can convict this man on. Now that's the problem, there was no articulated jury. Just goofs that wanted to dress alike all throughout the trial. The moment I would've seen that circus act I would've demanded a retrial on the fact the jury had talk to each other during the trial. In a normal criminal court setting that bullshit is sanctioned. The whole trial was a kangaroo atmosphere. The judge Edward Burmilla and Glassgow the States attorney went against each other in a States Attorney election. So naturally it is assume by the general public that here is bad blood between the two. There is nothing like that whatsoever. In fact I wouldn't be surprise if they are both really good friends. Isn't this a conflict of interest? And what about that stooge retired geez judge White. Why is he on the right of Glaspuss nodding his head in agreement after the verdict. Isn't this a conflict of interest? What a joke.

Brodsky, and his client were the two seeking out the media, and the attention. Now, he wants to sue? LOL Brodsky... you asked for it...you got it.

Hi bmail57. I just said its a possibility. Stacy Peterson according to her primary care physician suffered from clinical depression. Her biological mother ran away. These are facts. Is it likely she would leave her children? My opinion is of course not. However in conscious I cannot convict a man with no eyewitnesses or DNA evidence concerning the murder of Kathlene Savio. There was no signs of a break in, no DNA evidence, no eyewitnesses, Kathlene Savio suffered from cervical vertigo and at one time according to her primary care physician called down a flight of stairs due to dizziness from her cervical vertigo. Too many holes to cover, and this case for conviction was not beyond a reasonable doubt.

I meant falled down a flight of stairs not called. Typo.

If drew did it, prove it...... have not seen proof... and when stacey is done hanging on the beach and wants her kids she will be back. Stop thinking its always a man at fault.......Free Drew