Ten candidates have filed for the four Valley View school board seats that will be contested on the April 9 ballot.
Those ten include three incumbents (Liz Campbell, Ronnie Bull and Chrystal Hansen) and seven challengers. Jim Curran will not run for re-election of his school board seat.
Bolingbrook residents Deborah Sykora, Sinatra Strong, Daniel Falese, Ron Doweidt, Tonia Young Barr, and Jaime Olson and Romeoville resident Robert Vandiver will also be on the ballot.
All seats are for four years. The deadline to file a petition to be on the April 9 ballot was Dec. 26.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
There are plenty of ways to keep up on Bolingbrook news:
Beth Mattson
7:09 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Go mrs sykora. The mattsons are proud of you.
Bolingbrook Joe
7:37 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
You misspelled Jaime Olson's name. She will make an excellent addition to the board and will bring independent thinking, something that seems to be missing from our local politics.
Melissa Sersland
11:47 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
She e-mailed me, and I changed it. Thanks!
Bob Jamesly
9:46 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Let's not vote for the incumbents who voted a bonus disguised as an "oral agreement" to Mitchem. $66k of our money just wasted. If they didn't pay him he was not going to go away. They still have to drive past empty foreclosed houses in VV district every day and represent unemployed and under employed constituents who paid that $66k.
Steve
2:15 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
I have to agree with Bob, this was representatives on our school board not doing what was best for the schools or the community they serve. It was a very poor decision and it happened at a time when the schools are trying despertly to save every red cent they can. If Mitchem is such a good leader/educator, I'd think he would have noticed this "omission" in his contract. The schools could have spent this money more wisely on other needs. Shame on those incumbents who voted to give him the money and shame on Mitchem for taking it.
dabrooklongtime
7:26 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
Just a note Liz Campbell did not vote for the reimbursement. I'm sure you were aware just making sure others know.
Anonymous
10:03 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
No offense to either candidate, but Chrystal Hansen and Ronnie Bull will not get my vote. They are members of the "Friends of VV" (along with Steve Quigley, Rick Gougis & Leo V). FOV approved Mitchem's $67k bonus, received large sums of money from special interest groups and they are part of Mayor Claar's regime.
I would like to see some fresh new faces serving on the board.
One more point: Board member Liz Cambell will get my vote because she voted NO to Mitchem's payout.
Steve
2:22 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Good point Rhonda - Liz Cambell is deserving of our vote. Hansen and Bull did not represent the schools or community wisely - They need to be replaced. But before these incumbents are voted out; how about having them reimburse the tax payers for Mitchem's bonus.
tom
6:30 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
Liz voted No because she wanted to table the vote for a later date.
Jim came out and said that didn't remember anything about a verbal agreement. He also said that the contract was only 2 pages long so he's not sure how it was missed.
You'd think that someone with a PhD would realize that his paycheck was short over $4,000 a MONTH and say something right away.
I don't think that anyone in Romeoville or Bolingbrook believe for one second that there was a verbal agreement.
VVSDdad
10:32 am on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
I too would like to see some fresh faces shake things up.
Mitchem's bonus... for doing what exactly?!?
Lowering the district's grading scale...shameful!!
We need people who want to RAISE our standards and challenge our children,
not continue to dumb down the system!
I had the privilege of hosting a foreign exchange student from Germany this past fall. She attended BHS. She confided to me that compared to the rigors and curriculum she had at home, our system is well behind. I agree, we seem to be more interested in just moving the kids along rather than raising the bar.
Caring Citizen
2:44 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Hansen and Bull voting to give Mitchem his bonus is a matter of integrity to me. Whether we don't like the idea of him getting a bonus (to cover his educational expenses which many sup. of districts get) is beside the point. The whole board agreed to give it to him when they discussed his contract. Just because it got inadvertently left out of the written contract is irrelevant. They knew they had promised it to him, and like more people should be nowadays they had integrity and stuck to their promise. More people today need to stand by their word, instead of going back on promises. How nice would this be? "Yea, we promised you an education bonus (reimbursement), oh, it got left out? Well, too bad, stinks to be you!" If your boss told you in Jan. that at the end of the year you were going to get $5,000 to reimburse some work expenses, but you and he forgot to write it down in your contract, then in Dec. he says, "oh well, it's not in your contract, and I changed my mind." You'd be upset! That's just not nice, and I appreciate the board members that stuck to their word.
Steve
4:54 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
From what I recall from articles in the Bolingbrook Patch at the time this matter was put before the board, the whole board did not agree to give him this bonus. It seems Mitchem did get a majority of the board to go along with the idea it had been promised to him but overlooked in the contract. But a minority said that they never heard of any sort of promise to reimburse him for his education costs. So just as we disagree the board was in disagreement and it was not unanimous.
I also tend to think that even if he was owed the bonus, he should have been a standup guy and refused to accept it under the current economic circumstances. Many citizens of Bolingbrook are out of work or working minimum wage jobs and they had to pay for this, wouldn't you think someone in his position making the money he makes would have the integrity to turn this down since it was "inadvertantly" left out of his contract.
Lettuce
5:33 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Steve is right. There were several members of the board that were not present at the meeting where he was given the mysterious money. When they returned, some of them had absolutely no memory of making such a deal. Shocking? No. They would have voted NO. There is a reason the $66,000 vote popped up when it did.
Time to clean house.
Bob Jonas
5:01 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Most legal agreements, contracts these days state that what is included in the contract is what is agreed upon and anything promised either verbally or in writing prior to his contract is null and void and does not apply. This bonus was not int he contract. When Mitchem read the contract, it was his responsibility to make sure everything he wanted or was discussed was in the contract prior to signing it. He did not. Why? It's just speculation, but maybe he was conspiring with several board members to use this as a way of getting the bonus that would he would not have gotten otherwise if it was made public in his contract.
Anonymous
5:11 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Very excellent point. The only way a "transaction" like this can happen is if you have cronies sitting on the board. I can't in good conscious vote on any person tied to an established regime. It's nothing more than a breeding ground for corruption.
(not saying that this case is an example...just saying that it's a breeding ground..)
I don't like it.
Caring Citizen
8:57 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
From the Patch article on July 16, 2012: "School Board Members Venegas, Quigley, Gougis and Ronnie Bull voted in favor of the contract amendment. Campbell abstained from voting. Board Members Jim Curran and Chrystal Hansen were absent from the meeting." If you're going to complain and try to persuade people not to vote for certain board members because of how they voted to accept the amended contract for Mitchem, at least take Hansen out of your comments, she wasn't even at the meeting in July.
Steve
9:31 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
I apologize I didn't take the time to research the vote completely and mistakenly thought Hansen was one who voted for the reimbursement. If she was not present then I retract my comments about voting her out. However I still believe anyone involved in the approval of the reimbursement should be voted out when they are up for re-election. Which if I understand correctly would be Venegas, Quigley, Gourgis, and Bull.
Anonymous
9:20 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013
I disagree, and not confused by Chrystal's absence from that particular vote. It's all strategy - skip the meeting so as to not go on record saying yay or nay.
Here's an idea: Just ask Mrs. Hansen point blank rather or not she support the $67k "bonus".
Caring Citizen
4:04 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
Wow - Rhonda your comments are often so negative, I think you sit around just looking for ways to trash people. I happen to know where Mrs. Hansen works and around that time last year she was on vacation and planning her son's wedding. The school board members are volunteers, I think many times we forget this, and they do have lives and families to attend to. This is why many good people aren't running for public office in this country, because all we do is trash and rip apart people and often ruin their reputation, and for many people the sacrifice is just not worth it. Let's try not to forget they are PEOPLE just like you and me, they are not perfect, but a little grace once in a while would be refreshing. And I didn't say how she would vote, I choose not to speculate about people, but it the truth needs to be said that she was not there and did not cast a vote.
John Q. Public
4:19 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
Caring Citizen, you've got Rhonda pegged! People saw right through her the last time she ran for office. She's been bitter ever since! She's aligned with that trash called the CFBB who tried to overthrow government in Bolingbrook a few years back but failed! She stalks her targets on Patch and attacks every chance she gets then tries to weasel out of it when called out! She's essentially a loser!
Anonymous
4:21 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
You are absolutely correct in part - I am very critical of any elected official controlling more than $200 million of our tax dollars. That's what Mrs. Hansen and her fellow members were elected to do.
If that seems too negative to you, so be it, and so what.
Anonymous
4:39 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
Caring Citizen & John Q: If you don't like members in the community questioning BB leaders you do have a choice: YOU CAN MOVE.
Caring Citizen
4:58 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
I choose not to be critical, I choose to hold people accountable, and be constructive. And I can hold people accountable and even disagree with them respectfully, and cordially. I can question, without being accusatory. I can question, without assuming everything is a scandal Yes, this can be done. I have gone to school board meetings, and I have asked questions of the board members (I don't necessarily agree with them on everything), but question truly to get answers and really weigh both sides and give suggestions, or to be part of a constructive solution. I believe that way more good gets accomplished this way. (Just my humble opinion).
Anonymous
5:10 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
Whatever works for you. Like I stated earlier, the community is very diverse, made up of many voices. In a democracy, every voice should be heard. Not just the voices you want to hear.
I have made it a practice to keep a conversation going about local government because there needs to be a discussion. Obviously, there are members in the community that feel the same way, just read their comments on this page. [you can call me every name in the book, it won't change the facts]
This is not personal, it's all about how elected officials in Bolingbrook spend our tax dollars. Maybe the $67k payout is not that big of a deal to you. News Flash! It's a very big deal to me.
PS: I'm really sorry that this fact bothers you.
Valerie Summers
10:43 pm on Wednesday, January 2, 2013
lol Caring Citizen, you sound like you could be Mitchem himself.
As far as a contract goes, it is the persons responsibility to go over a contract before signing. I mean, he is supposed to be a smart man right?? Also knowing the security problems we have at 3 of our schools, not having the front holding area to check people in before they have access to the students, would have been a great place for him to pass on to the Children.I also agree He messed up big time with the grading 90/10, but he got so much crap about it, I know he knows it was a bad idea, but will never pull back on it. I think he has done some good things too though.
When I hear he cares about our kids, i think that is not fully true, he is a man getting paid good money for a job. I dont think it is anything more then that.
I also want to add that Dan Falese is good people. He has a great family, with some very well mannered kids.
I would also like to say that the 3 schools i speak of as far as needing that holding area, none of my 3 VVSD children go there. Plenty of things needed for security of my kids schools, but i think we should all agree, that needs to come first. That money could have gotten that well on its way.
Steve
3:20 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
Valerie, as to your comments about Mitchem being responsible for reading his contract before signing it, I agree with you. In my own awkward way I was trying to say the same thing. He's well educated and supposedly smart enough to be hired as the Superintendent of our schools, could he be foolish enough to not take the time to thoroughly read his contract, which from what I'd read previously was a mere ten pages. I also don't believe the 90/10 grading system is the way to go. Nonetheless, if it works; “Good-for-him”, but if it doesn't, then he needs to rethink his position. As for Laverty, although I've not had any involvement with the man, I've heard nothing but good things about him.
Valerie Summers
1:22 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013
I failed to share the goods about Mitchem.......he knew who we had as principal wasn't working for us at BJ Ward, so they went to heaven, and got us this angle man Mr. W!!! He truly is doing this job for the kids. The Staff loves him, and you feel that when you walk in. He has gone over and beyond to help these kids. What man would get a huge garage sale going over on his
time off with his staff
, to raise money for children to get children healthy snacks.
MR. Laverty is the best thing to ever happened to HHH. He is great with the kid, and is always acaLLY
Valerie Summers
1:31 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013
Sorry, it went before I was done Dan Laverty is the best!!! Kids love him, and parents do to. He is always available to any of us!!! And he has put many things in place, and fixed others. The kids are so more happy with him there, he can manage it all!!! He is the best!!!
tom
6:31 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
Let's not forget that our teachers and parapros have been working since Aug without a contract!
Steve
7:11 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013
Tom - family members of mine work for VVSD 365U and I'm keenly aware of the contract negotiations. I'm saddened by what they're being asked to give up, but I guess in the current economic climate we're in, all the little people have to make sacrifices. )-:
dabrooklongtime
7:37 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
Lets also not forget that friends of mine who work for the district were told in meetings regarding the first contract that was voted down that there were many items that were "gentlemen's agreements." The union president said that some of the reimbursements, etc wouldn't be written in the contract but they were agreed upon. As a member of a union myself I told my friend he is insane if he decides to vote yes on anything that isn't written. Melissa, how come the patch isn't giving more coverage to the fact of what was proposed and voted down in October and the idea that we are now in January with no contract in place.....shouldn't the public have what information they can have as they consider their schoolboard votes?
tom
7:42 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
If you go to the VVSD website there is a link for the "purposed contract" on the HR page but the page requires you to sign in to view. So unless you're a district employee, you can NOT view the purposed contract.
Anonymous
9:39 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
Good point.
Steve
2:39 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013
Thanks for your comment, I believe there is a lot of truth to what you expressed. As a resident of Bolingbrook, and one who also has family working in our school district I think there should be more coverage regarding what's going on in these negotiations. I don't think I've seen much as far as coverage in the Bolingbrook Patch.
Curious
7:45 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
Rhonda,
I heard that you moved out of VVSD boundaries but that you're kids are still going to Pioneer.
If you hate the district and what it represents so much, why did you keep your children in school here instead of sending them to the school in the neighborhood where you now live?
Anonymous
9:36 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
Curious: If you care to provide your full name, instead of hiding behind an alias, I can answer your question OPENLY.
There's no smoking gun here.
Here's a bit of advice: You don't help the Friends of VV's cause by attacking me (or my children) under assumed names. If anything, you display the very thing I'm fighting against - the bullying by Claar & Regime supporters.
I absolutely love Bolingbrook, and VVSD. I've lived here for more than 12 years, and plan on retiring right here.
You need to get used to the questions. I'm here to stay.
Curious
9:51 am on Friday, January 4, 2013
Rhonda,
Are you denying that your children attend Pioneer school even though you no longer reside within the boundaries?
dabrooklongtime
8:28 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013
Plus currently there is no proposed contract. The one that was proposed was thrown out because staff voted it down and a new one hasn't been proposed yet. My understanding is the district is claiming they have no money so teachers are being offered raises that don't even match a cost of living increase, they will pay more in insurance, less will be reimbursed for higher leanring and they are being asked to work more hours. Meanwhile upwards of 15 to 20 admin jobs have been created in two years, renovations on buildings have been done to the tune of 1.5 million dollars and we spend more and more on programs for the kids whose parents are probably not paying local taxes because they are on state aide or use the homeless label and move their kids in w an aunt/grandparent. Why does none of this get coverage so that our communities can see what's really going on instead of just what's being told at forums.
ready for a change
2:15 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013
Sykora has my vote! She is a retired math teacher from the VVSD and has a heart for the students. I do believe she will make a difference. As for Ronnie Bull, well let's just say he has served his time on the board and could use a break. It is unfortunate that some other positions aren't up for replacement.
Valerie Summers
8:45 am on Saturday, January 12, 2013
Curious : So what if Rhonda's kids go to pioneer school. If she still lives in the VVSD area, and only moved a few miles, there are steps you can do to keep your kids at the school they are accustom too. I moved only a few blocks, changing one of my 3 children's schools by one block. One year he went to the new school, and we had many problems. We positioned to go back to our school for his last year. And we got approved. I think you need to worry about the kids getting shipped in from other areas, not a bolingbrook resident. I have been here for 41 years and my husband and myself have also gone through the VVSD school system. Though I don't think Rhonda should be getting so emotional on these patch threads, I don't see how where her kids go to school is an issue. As I said, worry about the children who's parents don't pay taxes to this town, there are so many of them claiming to displaced and living with someone here in town, and it not being true!!! I have family who lives out here, in 4 different residences, all who pay taxes to our schools, and only 2 of them have children in our schools. So are you going to say something about me for my child being in his original school to find ish out his last year. I did it the right way, as I'm sure Rhonda has.