patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

'They Got The Murdering Bastard'

Family and friends of Kathleen Savio broke down in tears after Drew Peterson's guilty verdict was read. The family and friends of Peterson's fourth wife are still waiting for their day in court.

 

When the jury filed in a bit before 3 p.m. Thursday, Drew Peterson knew he was looking at either a flight to New York to go on the Today show or a bus ride to Stateville to spend what's left of his life in prison.

The jury told him he was going to be taking the bus.

After a day and a half of deliberation and a 24-day trial, the jury found Peterson guilty of murdering his third wife, Kathleen Savio.

"I loved my sister very much. She's finally getting the justice she deserved," said Savio's sister, Susan Doman.

"He's a sick man," Doman said of Peterson. "He's an evil man."

Doman's husband, Mitch Doman, hugged his wife outside the courtroom and said, "They got the murdering bastard."

Judge Edward Burmila set Peterson's sentencing date for Nov. 26. Peterson, 58, faces 20 to 60 years in prison.

Check out more coveage of the verdict on Patch

Peterson showed no emotion as the verdict was read, but after the jury was led out and deputies started clearing the public from the courtroom he collapsed into a chair.

Peterson appeared well on his way to an acquittal until defense attorney Joel Brodsky made the curious decision to call Wheaton lawyer Harry Smith to the witness stand.

Smith represented Savio in her divorce from Peterson and said he spoke to Peterson's next wife, Stacy Peterson, just days before she mysteriously vanished in October 2007.

Brodsky said he called Smith to testify in hopes of sullying Stacy's reputation by painting her as a gold-digging blackmailer. Instead, Smith repeatedly drove home the point that Stacy told him Peterson killed Savio.

After Peterson was found guilty, Brodsky claimed calling on Smith to testify was the right move. Brodsky also said the case against Peterson was a "stacked deck."

A large crowd heckled Brodsky and the other attorneys on the defense team while they spoke to the media.

"The whole world wanted Drew Peterson to be convicted," said defense attorney Joseph "Shark" Lopez. "They've hated him from Day 1."

Lopez also mocked the hecklers, saying, "They've got nothing better to do. They're unemployed."

Brodsky said he was already planning Peterson's appeal.

Savio was found drowned in a dry bathtub in March 2004. Despite the strange circumstances of her death—and the fact that she and Peterson were in the midst of a tumultuous, allegedly violent divorce—detectives with the Illinois State Police quickly determined she perished in a freak bathtub accident.

But when Stacy disappeared three and a half years later, the state police were forced to take another look at their investigation of Savio's death. When they did, they changed their collective mind, declaring she was the victim of a homicide and charging Peterson with her murder in May 2009.

Only one other witness, the Rev. Neil Schori, was allowed to tell the jury how Stacy revealed to him that Peterson killed Savio.

Schori, who said Stacy confided in him about Savio's murder during a marriage counseling session within two months of her disappearance, said he and his wife cried when they heard Peterson had been found guilty.

"We literally wept together," he said. "It's been a long, long journey.

"I'm absolutely thrilled with what happened," Schori said. "Justice is coming for Stacy's family too."

The state police named Peterson the sole suspect in what they termed the "potential homicide" of Stacy Peterson, but have yet to charge him with harming her.

Will County State's Attorney James Glasgow, who said he prayed with Schori just before the verdict came in, said prosecutors will indeed review the Stacy case.

Glasgow also called Peterson a "coward and a bully," and said he murdered Savio "because he was larger than she was."

"He would threaten people because he had a gun and a badge," Glasgow said. "No one ever took him on. We took him on, and he lost."

Pam Bosco, the foster mother of Stacy's sister Cassandra Cales, attended every day of the lengthy trial. She called on Glasgow to charge Peterson with killing Stacy.

"This man has to pay for Stacy," Bosco said. "There's no reason this man can't be taken back into this courtroom and go through this hell again. Stacy's case is right around the corner. I believe that. I always believed that he would pay the price for killing two beautiful women."

Stacy's sister said the verdict was still sinking in.

"I feel numb. It hasn't really hit me yet," said Cales, adding, "Game over, Drew."

Stacy's aunt Candace Aikin was elated for the Savio family.

"I'm excited," Aikin said. "I had to hold all my tears till I ran down the hallway, crying like a baby."

But even with Peterson heading to prison, Aikin was still worried.

"I'm really concerned about the children," she said. "It's just my concern for them because they don't have a mother, and now they're losing a father they wanted to come home. My heart's breaking for them."

Stacy and Peterson's two children—Lacy, 7, and Anthony, 9—live in Peterson's home and are cared for by a son Peterson had with his first wife, Carol Hamilton. The two sons Peterson and Savio had together, and were later adopted by Stacy, are attending college.

None of Peterson's family was present when the jury rendered its verdict.

After finding Peterson guilty, the jury chose not to address the media. Instead, they provided Deputy Chief Ken Kaupas of the Will County Sheriff's Department with a written statement.

“We have taken the responsibility bestowed on us by the court with a great deal of solemnity and diligence," the statement said. "After much deliberation, we have reached a decision we believe is just.”

Kaupas said Peterson will not be placed on any sort of suicide watch. He was put in the medical pod of the Will County jail for his own protection from the beginning of his incarceration more than three years ago, and that is where a suicidal inmate would go.

"Anybody who's convicted of murder or a violent crime, we put extra watch on anyway," Kaupas said. "That's not because it's Drew. That's standard protocol."

Related Topics: Courts, Drew Peterson, Guilty, Kathleen Savio, Murder, Stacy Peterson, and Trial

Clutche

10:42 pm on Thursday, September 6, 2012

First time in Drew's life that he lost a battle...hope he gets 60 years.

Reply

Jeanne Hall

7:48 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

No doubt he'll get life without parole. But no doubt he will appeal.

Reply

Bob Laird

8:13 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

he will appeal and it will cost us taxpayers another huge wad of cash. just shoot the s.o.b.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Rose Redlich

10:12 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Amen Bob.....I would be one in line to shoot him. He has told Stacy's BFF that no one would be able to prove that he killed her because no one will find the body. He is such an arce.

Matt

9:57 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Convicted on hearsay. Very scary stuff.

Reply
Comment_arrow

charles

11:45 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Heresay was the final nail in his coffin. It was pounded in right after medical evidence and circumstantial evidence. Used all alone, heresay might've set him free; used in conjuction with the other evidence, he's in the running for Inmate of the Year.

Comment_arrow

Pam

12:23 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Hearsay evidence put in by his own attorneys.

Comment_arrow

LW

4:47 pm on Saturday, September 8, 2012

Way to go defense! Your cocky attitude finally made you slip!
Drew Peterson was convicted on hearsay, namely from Harry Smith and Neil Schori, that was established over 400 years ago in England, and not by Drew's Law, which was replaced with the implementation of Federal Rule of Evidence by the Illinois Supreme Court in 2011. "This new law created a new hearsay exception, with the admissibility of statements under … the burden of establishing 3 criteria by a preponderance of the evidence:
(1) first, that the adverse party murdered the declarant and that the murder was intended to cause the unavailability of the declarant as a witness;
(2) second, that the time, content, and circumstances of the statements provide sufficient safeguards of reliability;
(3) third, the interests of justice will best be served by admission of the statement into evidence."
This exception to hearsay is common law based and has survived over 400 years of precedence in court.
See "http://lawprofessors.typepad.com/evidenceprof/2012/09/yesterday-a-jury-finally-convicted-drew-peterson-of-the-murder-of-his-third-wifekathleen-savio-many-articles-discussing-th.html";; for further info on why Drew will not win an appeal based on hearsay.

Comment_arrow

Marilynn Reinhardt

10:35 am on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Matt, I totally agree with you. We've all seen suspected criminals found guilty on shoddy evidence. I think it's a sad day when a person can be convicted solely on hearsay evidence. Where was the forensic evidence putting him at the "crime" scene? And can we believe everyone who testified against Mr. Peterson did so honestly & did not perjure themselves? If he is, in fact, guilty, then he deserves a punishment to fit the crime. But if he isn't guilty, then this is a miscarriage of justice.

lala

10:05 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Just saw this in the Chicago Tribune:
"It's hard to get a conviction reversed," said attorney Kathleen Zellner, who has handled a number of wrongful conviction cases and who went to the Will County Courthouse to watch several days of Peterson's trial. "This case is solid. I don't think there's reversible error there."

Reply

Pro Life Crusader +

10:48 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

That's her opinion, but others said there's a good chance.

Reply
Comment_arrow

joliet resident

10:29 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

If Kathleen Zellner told me I didn't have a chance I would be pretty upset. She is a very smart attorney!

A. Neighbor

11:00 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

Who's laughing now Drew? Finally; we won't have to look at your smug face anymore! I hope hell has a special place for crap like you. Get ready to play some "drop the soap" with your buddie's. How could you have done this to your family? Have a cigar with the 3- stooge's defense team to celebrate!

Reply

Pro Life Crusader +

11:58 am on Friday, September 7, 2012

I can attest to Tommy's article in the Chicago Sun -Times that his grandfather and Aunts had nothing to do do with Tommy or Kris when their mother Kathy was alive. Why? Because Kathy once told my wife and I first hand, that Kathy was in fact estranged from her family and really has nothing to do with them and she didn't want her family to take care of Tommy and Kris in the event anything ever happened to her and Drew. Strange isn't it. Tommy and Kris if you read this, you will probably know who I am and I'm here for the both of you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Rose Redlich

7:02 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

That is why Drew married her. He only marries woman who dont have good standings with their family so that he can control and do what he wants with them. Sad thing is that is how he raised his boys and they do as they were taught.

Comment_arrow

Mitch Doman

11:30 am on Monday, November 19, 2012

Pro life you don't know what the hell you are saing your just another ass clown of that MURDERING BASTARD

Martin

12:32 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

While Drew is one of the biggest SOBs in the State and in general a slimy guy that I wouldn't hang with nor let my daughter date....passing a law that specifically targets 1 individual is wrong. This case will get overturned at State Supreme or SCOTUS. It is a very dangerous precident to set that so-and-so told me that they saw someone do something...and now that so-and-so is missing\dead, that chat can be admitted.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dave

1:22 pm on Monday, September 10, 2012

the passed law just went with the the Federal law which has been on the books for over 100 years, and it was not even used, that was forfieture by wrong doing, do not listen to his lawyers, they always make thing look different than what it really is, glad you were not on the jury!

Volpe d'argento UNO

12:56 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

I agree with you on everything , with the exception of letting my daughter date Drew , I would!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Martin

1:49 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Volpe...that's your choice..gotta love choice.

Granted its easy for me to say that right now...in 3-4 years when my daughter starts dating, will I stand against a slimy SOB like Drew? only time will tell. :)

Comment_arrow

Anna Rose Redlich

7:04 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

sad you dont love your daughter.....I heard from his own mouth tell Stacys best friend that he will NEVER get convicted of her murder because he knows how to get rid of a body or make it look like and accident and YES I heard him say this in public to her.

stef

1:19 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

He would never have been able to come back to Bolingbrook and live a normal life (if he was freed) ---- I think his life would have been in danger every single day.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Martin

1:47 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Stef, you are so right on that. Between the Savios, Stacey's family, that nut from CIncy, and all the other vendetta folks out there, Drew would never have had a quiet moment again.

Pro Life Crusader +

1:33 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

stef why would his life be in danger if he was acquitted?

Reply

stef

1:42 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Because a lot of people believe he is guilty.

Reply

Pro Life Crusader +

1:55 pm on Friday, September 7, 2012

Guilty by their gut feelings, not by evidence. If he were acquitted it's no ones business to harm him or anyone else in the same situation,

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Rose Redlich

7:05 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

I would go to jail to kill that bastard

RobynD323

2:53 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

"Brodsky said he was already planning Peterson's appeal." Brodsky my friends, is one big, fat, liar. He knows better. He fuels the media with vicious lies. Brodsky simply can't swallow his bitter pill. He wanted to remain a super-star his infamous client made him for 5 years. Now, Brodsky is a loser. All of these attorney's know the general public can't "convict anyone" that is total nonsense. While I wish for Tom Peterson , this would give him some future hope, it's all a lie. Everything Lopez & Brodsky has told this young man is a LIE! (Along with his own father, Drew) Brodsky can not be successful on any appeal. AND Brodsky knows this. I know this. The people in legal circles, know this. This case was tried very, very, carefully. No laws, and nobody's constitutional rights, were changed (or violated) so they could jail Drew Peterson. That is fictitious BS, Brodsky and that sorry defense team has twisted, to the media. Hoping the non-attorney general public would believe such garbage. Brodsky simply made a very terrible call and Drew is, GUILTY! Which is best suited for this terrible crime against two women. It sickens me that Brodsky, Greenberg, & Lopez continue to tell the media lies. This case was carefully over seen by the IL. Supreme courts before it ever went to criminal trial. The entire defense team is now being brought before the Illinois Bar Association. They make good, respectable lawyers look really bad.

Reply

RobynD323

2:55 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

And you will never see this case reversed on appeal. Mark my words. There is absolutely nothing to appeal. Brodsky, please stop lying giving Drew's terribly victimized children false hope. Brodsky is one sorry sack of suds. Just like his client.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Anna Hultin

1:07 pm on Monday, September 10, 2012

ditto Robyn323....took the words out of my mouth.....

Zandy Zinkler

2:56 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Robyn, are you just realizing they are all liars now? Welcome to the real world hunny!

Reply
Comment_arrow

joliet resident

8:17 pm on Sunday, September 9, 2012

Brodsky was on Fox with the judge last night and you can tell he has totally lost it. He is still trying to argue his sorry case that he personally lost. He said Drew agreed he wanted the attorney to testify. Note to Brodsky, it's never popular to speak ill of the deceased.

Dave

1:17 pm on Monday, September 10, 2012

Do not forget! The Illinois Supreme Court as well as The U.S. Supreme Court have both affirmed "Herasay" and stated it is Constitutional, so there will be no reversal by either Court. He will be in prison for a long while.

Reply

Mickey

10:36 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Joe Lopez reminds me of Ian Hawke in Alvin & the Chipmunks

Reply

joliet resident

11:05 am on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Well Mickey that may be a new career path for Lopez. Seems like the attorney business is not doing so hot for him.

Reply

Skb

8:44 pm on Sunday, November 11, 2012

It is a sad day when they can make laws just hit you

Reply

Skb

1:53 am on Monday, November 12, 2012

Tommy and kris if your reading this please please don't look up pro life crusader. She is as crazy as drew!

Reply

Skb

1:54 am on Monday, November 12, 2012

Matt you are absolutely correct.

Reply

Leave a comment