I have a friend who lives in Romeoville and works at a local hospital, and therefore works long hours and nights.
Mowing his lawn weekly is probably not the highest on his priority list.
This time, however, he received a not so friendly reminder from Romeoville Code Enforcement regarding grass and/or weeds in excess of six inches. His grass was just approaching the 6.1 inch mark.
Code Enforcement was out in full swing.
He received a few other violations such as a small boat in his back yard was not on an approved surface and so on. He has just a few days to comply without facing fines.
I took the opportunity to joke with my friend about the violations, saying that he should move to Bolingbrook where there doesn’t seem to be any rules or enforcement. He’s going to make the time to maintain his property and avoid fines.
I remember when I first moved into Bolingbrook during the summer of 2004. I started fixing up my house (one of the older houses in Bolingbrook) and was told by neighbors that even if I was going to put a nail into the exterior of my house, I should be sure to check into permits and read the various village codes and ordinances. On Saturdays, I remember code enforcement workers driving around, writing ordinance violations and checking permits.
Needless to say, times have changed.
There have been major cuts to the code enforcement, which is now overseen by the police department.
Foreclosures go unmaintained by the banks and unnoticed by the village.
Anything goes.
There are instances of three to four families living in single family homes. Want to park your car in the middle of your lawn? Go for it. Replace your leaking roof with a nice new blue tarp? No one will fine you. Even the police blotter on this site (The Patch) continuously list the theft of hot water tanks and copper pipes from vacant properties.
A house near Tibbott Elementary School was stripped of its gutters and hot water tank, leaving an unsafe structure for children in the area.
Since spring is upon us, I took the opportunity to reach out to the Bolingbrook Police Department to see if anything has changed from last year.
Sergeant Craig Gunty, who is in charge to the two person code enforcement team, is always willing to respond to major eyesores in the community. There is no doubt that Sergeant Gunty and his team work hard and do their part to respond to residents.
Unfortunately, with only two employees, Bolingbrook code enforcement is instructed to be reactive instead of proactive.
Sergeant Gunty responded to my e-mail, stating:
I have only 2 guys now for a town of over 21,000 single family residences and they do all the apartment and home rental inspections also. We used to have 8 full timers and 5 seasonal employees but with the economic downturn we lost far too many. The result is we went from being 90% proactive to being 95% reactive. I am sorry to say we do not have the ability to drive or walk subdivisions like we used to do. We get so many calls now that they literally get put on a waiting list. I myself am now in charge of 3 divisions so I can’t even get out and help them like I used to. What I have been asking of our residents is that you send me an email or call me with addresses and a brief description of the problem at homes in your area and we will take it from there.”
Without a doubt, our police and public employees work hard to make Bolingbrook a better place to live.
This is a matter of how we should invest in the community. Many of our capital expenditures for this year involve infrastructure improvement such as streets and landscaping around the commercial sides of town.
But what about investing in the beatification of the neighborhoods where people live? Wouldn’t a maintained neighborhood result in increased housing value, new home purchases, and therefore an increase in sales and property tax revenues? Is a code enforcement team of two able to support a village of 74,000+ residents? Do you consider code enforcement a need or nuisance? Is there an adequate pay-off of code enforcement officials and property values?
Please share your thoughts.
Beth
8:26 pm on Thursday, May 12, 2011
Great article....and I 100% believe code enforcement is necessary and wish they had more help!
Amber
9:32 pm on Thursday, May 12, 2011
Code enforcement is a great thing for many things!
marianne Kozlik
8:16 am on Friday, May 13, 2011
In 1977 I was the Supervisor of Code Enforcement at that time our code enforcement department made news inter-nationally. On what was obviously a slow news day, the AP picked up a story carried in the Joliet Herald, when I reported to our village board about our plan to "Blitz" the community. The story was picked up by virtually every newspaper in the world, including the Marianna Islands, the Washington Post, NY Times, London Times etc. etc. Channels 2,5,7 & 9 carried a piece on the story.Bolingbrook was a buzz with positive comments.
Eventually I realized that everyone cares about local ordinances being enforced, especially if you live in a neighborhood where people do not maintain their property. We received any where between 20 to 30 calls a day from residents when the population was around 30,000. I received another 15 to 20 calls from people in other communities asking how to get some response from their towns. That summer we sent out more than 2,000 copies of our property maintenance ordinances to other towns all over the world. I also included a short "how-to" use these ordinances effectively. The main issue... how to deal with residence that could not financially correct the violations. I enlisted the help of a local non-profit organization for a $3,000 grant for residence that could truly not afford making the corrections. They were interviewed by a financial couselor at the Bolingbrook Counseling Center (now the CSC) to verify the need. It worked M Kozlik
marianne Kozlik
8:25 am on Friday, May 13, 2011
I never responded to your question....not enough room. The single most valuable asset that most Bolingbrook residents own is their home. Protecting the value of that asset should be of
concern to us all. Ask any realtor or appraiser how the value of a property in deflated when an unslightly property is next door. mk
Ken Cygan
9:04 am on Friday, May 13, 2011
Marianne- Thank you for your service to the community. I agree that some may not have the means to handle all required maintenance. I will check with the CSC and see if they have a grant program in our area. I know some other suburbs have TIF programs and other incentives to help people improve the street-facing parts of their property. Working with the banks to get the foreclosed properties maintained would be a major step in the right direction. I have talked with a few realtor's in the area.. Even one bad property near a house for sale may chase away a potential buyer.
marianne Kozlik
9:46 am on Friday, May 13, 2011
The "grant" came from the Bolingbrook Housing Association, no longer active, the CSC provided financial couseling notifying the BHA if the resident was truely unable to pay for the needed maintenance. We found that many people claimed they couldnot afford the needed repairs, but when asked to see a financial counselor in order to be eligible for a grant they declined the offer and found the money to do it themselves. Just having the grant available made the job a lot easier. It also helped when residents were given tickets and summons to court.