.
Feedback

Parents Kept Out of Classroom Parties Part of Valley View Safety Measures

Valley View Superintendent James Mitchem announced additional safety and security measures to be put in place following Friday's elementary school shooting in Newtown, CT.

Valley View School District 365U has announced additional safety measures in the wake of Friday's school shooting in Newtown, CT. 

Want to get the latest Bolingbrook news in your inbox every morning? Sign up for our daily newsletter.

The measures include locking classroom and school doors, prohibiting food from being brought in and requiring each school to hold an "active shooter" drill this week. 

Random "magnetic wand" searches will take place on a regular basis at the two high schools and five middle schools. 

The district is revisiting its visitor procedures, and Bolingbrook and Romeoville police have agreed to step up their patrols in school neighborhoods for the foreseeable future. 

"Please know that the first, and most important, priority for Valley View Community Unit School District 365U has always been, and will continue to be, the safety of our students and staff," Superintendent James Mitchem wrote in a letter to the community Monday. 

Valley View already has a "top-notch security network in place," Mitchem wrote, including a comprehensive, nationally recognized Crisis Management Plan that incorporates ongoing lockdown drills, administrator and staff training and elaborate school safety procedures covering every imaginable scenario.

The district employs dozens of fully trained, full-time security personnel. Schools also restrict access through a variety of methods, including security holding areas at both high schools, buzzer-access at many of our schools and security cameras in both schools and on all of our buses. 

While the district is confident in its current measures, the following security measures have been added: 

  • Increased presence of VVSD-trained and employed security staff in our schools.
  • Until further notice, the doors to every classroom in the school district will remain locked while class is in session.
  • The main entrance doors to all school offices will remain locked throughout the day.
  • Each school will hold an “active shooter” hard lockdown either Wednesday or Thursday of this week.
  • Random “magnetic wanding” searches will take place on a regular basis at both high schools and all five middle schools.
  • We are reviewing current visitor procedures for the lunchroom to create more safeguards. While the review is underway, there will be a moratorium on adult access to students during the school day and for before school breakfast programs. We understand many parents value this special time with their children and want to find ways to ensure these opportunities continue to exist. However, until further notice, all such activities have been suspended.  
  • We are reviewing current visitor procedures for former students who will only be allowed access to buildings before or after school, and only if the visit is pre-arranged through the school office. 
  • Parents who come to school to pick up children must wait in the office until a school staff member brings the child to the office.
  • Everyone who enters a school will be required to provide identification and sign in
  • From this day forward, no food shall be brought into any school and shared with students. VVSD will no longer allow birthday treats, classroom rewards, snacks or any other food to be brought in from outside and shared with other students. This means parents cannot attend holiday parties this week nor can they provide food to share with others. You will receive further guidance from your building Principal.
  • Both the Bolingbrook and the Romeoville Police Departments have agreed to provide more frequent patrols in our school neighborhoods for the foreseeable future.
  • Our School Safety Department will re-visit each school’s annual safety audit to determine what, if any, additional safety procedures need to be put in place at each school.
  • Interviews will be conducted at each school to seek additional suggestions from administrators and school staff.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

There are plenty of ways to keep up on Bolingbrook news:

Annie H. December 18, 2012 at 03:35 am
I read the email from Dr. Mitchem with sadness and frustration. While I appreciate what I'm sure is a thoughtful response, I'm sad and frustrated that there is NO mention of any safety measures that include screening students for mental health issues or training staff members to be aware of possible issues in their students. I would hope this is already happening but I doubt it is a priority. I agree with Colleen. This does seem like a knee-jerk reaction. It would seem to me that, if you are buzzing people into the schools and checking their i.d., they should be allowed into the classrooms. I'm guessing when we tell most kids, perhaps middle school and younger in particular, that we parents are not allowed in their classrooms anymore, they will have a lot of questions and concerns. Furthermore, I am VERY upset about the locking of classrooms. My oldest said that this is common in the high school, which I didn't know, but it still concerns me greatly. Just from the comments above, it seems that our district's new policy is actually creating the opposite effect for our students; instead of making them feel safer, we are making them feel less safe. What's next? Will we ban parents from coming to concerts at the school or sport events? What will the security be for these events? How will we guarantee that no harm will come to our students there? I hope the district will reconsider this policy and be open to discussion about it at the next Board meeting - 1/14/13.
Ben December 18, 2012 at 05:05 am
I am concerned that this letter was sent out to our sons that go to Irene King. I sent a note to the superintendent regarding these changes and how it sounds like they were made without any parental review. Here is the letter that was sent. Please feel free to add comments and also send your concerns as I'm sure other parents may feel the same.
Today our sons came home with a letter from you regarding new safety measures at our schools post the tragic events that occurred on December 14, 2012 in Newtown, CT. Although we understand the reasoning and intentions we feel that it would have been better to have discussed these actions with the parents before any changes were made. The letter presented changes to our children's daily school life's without any feedback from the parents. This alone has upset us and many other parents that we have spoken with. We feel that the parents should have been given the opportunity to sit with yourself the board and local authorities to discuss safety and security measures especially since they affect our children's learning environment. With all of the concerns being raised we request that an emergency meeting be setup as soon as possible, preferably before the holiday break and in the evening where all of the school district parents can be available to review the proposals of the school board and local authorities to bring clarity and understanding to your actions.
Ben December 18, 2012 at 05:11 am
Here were the questions from the second half of my letter to the superintendent. I apologize this had to be separated due to size.
1. What training and credentials are required by the security staff? 2. Who are the security staff and can they be identified to the parents like the teachers? 3. With the classroom doors being locked, what process/plan is in place for the safety of the children in case of a fire or other such events and how do they meet state and local fire and safety codes? 4. What will be changed for visitors to the school now that the entry doors will be locked? What security system will be out in place? 5. How will the lock down drill be conducted and how does it differ from the current lock down procedure that is already in place. How does this plan meet state and local safety regulations? Will it be identified as an "Active Shooter" lock down?
Ben December 18, 2012 at 05:13 am
Last of the questions....
6. What will be the detail of the random magnetic wanding and how will it be carried out for students, teachers and other staff members? Will they follow similar processes as the TSA at airports? Male vs. Female, adult vs. Child, who will be present during searches etc. What are the altercations with an identified or false positive risk? 7. How will situations be handled when a parent requests to have their children leave school earlier? Come in tardy? Emergencies, etc? 8. What is the reasoning behind the banning of birthday treats, classroom rewards, snacks and other food brought in? 9. When the school safety department re-visits the safety audit please provide an open communication to the parents so that they can be reviewed and understood or questioned.
Travelmom December 18, 2012 at 09:57 am
I feel that this decision to "take away parties" in the classroom is ridiculous. Makes me feel as if we are in a communist country. Bring your children to school drop them off they are going to be locked in their rooms until you come to pick them up. Who is to say that if there is really going to be some crazy people out there what is going to keep them from showing up in the morning when the kids line up prior to school or show up after school when everyone is getting out of class. I guess Mr. Mitchem is nothing more than a "2K Scrooge"
Jeremy December 18, 2012 at 10:47 am
Annie, I couldn't agree with you more. Dr. Mitchem could care less about mental illness. He cut PBIS which screens children as young as kdg for disorders, and is considering cutting social workers to half-time at each school.
Purple Kitty Mom December 18, 2012 at 11:38 am
What makes the superintendent think that locking doors to classrooms will keep kids safer? Any nut job that bursts into a school with an assault rifle can easily shoot the door lock and gain entry into a classroom. Why couldn't they just lockdown the schools and add security at main entry doors?
ParentsWatchingU! December 18, 2012 at 12:32 pm
So if the parents are present in the classroom for Holiday Party how's that the school is less safe?? If you have a process to vett every entry is that not good enough? They limit the number of parents in each room? The damage to childern at the Elemetary School age will be an impact. One they will not forget. I don't see any compassion for the Childern. They need this time more than ever. They also need to feel safe at School. Locking the doors on classrooms has never worked to stop a lunatic. It may seem to Administrators that they are limiting access in the event of an active shooter. It's hard to believe that this sterile environment will do anything but frustrate staff, teachers, Administrators and the part that hurts the most the KIDS!!! It will hurt the everydeay activties of the childern. This is turn will hurt Academic achievement. If I wanted to send my child to Military School I would do that. Frustrated and Confused....
Tina Sillman December 18, 2012 at 12:56 pm
Way to support the authority figures who are trying to protect your children. It is inconvenient for some of the parents and change us scary for children, however, the superintendent and his staff had been only a weekend to put additional security measures in place. I agree with these measures. As a parent of a child at RC Hill and grandparent of a child at Irene King, I feel that the district is looking out for the best interests of my loved ones. Cancelled holiday parties are disappointing, but children survive disappointment and learning to deal with disappointment is part of life. Food bans are meant to protect those students with allergies, and food could be a way for an unbalanced person to harm our children with poison or drugs. Schools should have bullet proof glass in vestibule and office areas. Schools should have panic buttons to immediately alert police of a problem and lock classroom doors so entry into is more difficult. Any safeguards put in place that will discourage or slow down someone who would harm our children is welcome. I do not know every parent of every child in my son's classroom, while I want to trust them, how can I really know what another person is thinking. I am certain that these measures will be reviewed, but for now they make it more difficult for anyone to harm my son or grandson - which is my priority.
ParentsWatchingU! December 18, 2012 at 01:20 pm
@Tina in IMO This is simply an Overreaction to an event that could not be prevented. We can harden the target all we want build a 30 ft wall and call it Statesville. That seems like we are headed their. A communist nation is coming. Schools had procedures that were not followed on 12/14/12.. The procedures needed to reviewed re-trained, re-evaluated and followed thru. At the Elementary school level besides "Holiday Partys" assistance from Parents is needed. The district is overreacting. It's what they do best.. If someone wants to get into any school under VVSD they will. They will also cause harm if they have the will. This new procedure will not mitigate that. It would not lessen the impact. It only takes one incident to question the validity of safety.. So if something happens with all these procedures are in place do you still feel safe?? I know this much prior to the event of 12/14/12 and now after.
ParentsWatchingU! December 18, 2012 at 01:20 pm
The safety of my Kids is always questioned. I will never feel 100% confident about it. If I did the only person I am fooling is myself. I have always keenly observed the lack of procedures being followed to harden the perimeter. We don't need a Masscare to protect our childern and follow procedures. When the next event happens what will the reaction be then?? I gurantee it will happen again. It has become part of our society. This feels like punishment to the childern. That's my opinion and I firmly stand behind it! They can't take this on by themselves.. The school district isn't entitled without reviews from everyone. Including the parents!
Rhonda Reed-Slaughter December 18, 2012 at 02:37 pm
I appreciate Dr. Mitchem's absolute concern for our kids, but the reaction is too extreme. Where's the parents/taxpayers input? Why not have a town hall meeting that includes parents, teachers, administrators AND religious leaders in the community?
Relying solely on the administrators and/or security to solve the problem is ineffective. It makes more sense to bring in the ENTIRE community of Bolingbrook. After all, it's our children, our tax dollars, and our community. Even still, I do appreciate Dr. Mitchem's effort to keep our kids safe. I believe his heart is in the right place. Hopefully he will consider a town hall meeting and invite parents to attend and offer input, as well as religious leaders to assist in prayer and guidance.
Missy December 18, 2012 at 02:38 pm
I think all these new procedures are completely ridiculous. I understand the kids need to feel safe but this is by far overboard. I did not send my child to a public school to be treated like he is in prison. He is in Kindergarten and did love going to school but no longer wants to go since all of his fun times have now been taken away. Locking my child in a classroom is going to accomplish what exactly? there are still windows on his classroom wall. They don't open but are still there. So are they going to board up all of the windows on the building next? If someone cant get into the school from the outside they can still shoot through the windows. If there is a fire and the doors are locked how do they escape a fire fast. My son said the teacher has to lock the door with a key so how safe is that? Why now are these "safety" procedures being put into affect? I recall there have been shootings going on at schools for over 10 years. Malls, banks, movie theaters, and regular stores have shootings as well. Do you still go to those places with your kids? If you do how do you keep your child safe there? Do I think the schools need to add more security? Yes. But I do NOT think taking away there holiday parties and treats and other things that parents can no longer be involved in is the right way to handle it.
charles December 18, 2012 at 02:47 pm
I tend to agree with the majority here in that not all of these measures are necessary or prudent. Further, nothing we do will stop some determined crazy from doing the unspeakable if they truly want to. To that end, all of these new procedures that are now in place will simply inconvenience those who mean no harm to anyone. Better safe than sorry, yes, but too much is a bad thing as well. Mental health professionals have said repeatedly that the best way to move on from a tragedy is to stay in a routine; unfortunately, the routine holiday party, parent visits, etc is not possible now. So sad. VVSD had jumped the shark on this one! BTW: in regards to the locked classroom doors, they are locked only to keep people from entering the classroom; they pose no safety concern to making a quick exit. They are similar to those door locks on a hotel room where you better have your room key in your pocket before going for ice!
Missy December 18, 2012 at 02:53 pm
For all you parents that say the treats being taken away due to kids allergies is a good thing, I myself went to a public school (in VVSD) we had treats, holiday parties, special occasions, etc. the kids that couldn't eat certain things didn't. They were well informed by their parents and we never had those issues before.
Missy December 18, 2012 at 03:22 pm
Oh look Mr. Mitchem revised his plans and parents are allowed back in the schools and classrooms along with treats are welcomes back just as long as they aren't homemade. Good job parents for speaking up. At least he is willing to listen to what we have to say.
Melissa Sersland (Editor) December 18, 2012 at 03:26 pm
Valley View just announced it will be revising its food and visitor policies. You can read more here: http://patch.com/A-00bg
ejw December 18, 2012 at 03:36 pm
Schools aren't protected enough, parents complain. Schools are overprotected, parents complain. They (district admin) are damned if they do, and damned if they don't. To all parents, your kids will inevitably suffer from other people's actions. Is it fair, NO...is it reality, YES. Sorry, but the world you grew up in has changed GREATLY. The teachers know how this is effecting their students, and are undoubtedly saddened by that; but what other choices are there? You can criticize and question all you want, but when the "you know what" hits the fan, your criticism will be "why didn't they do more?!?!?". Its not communism, its not prison, its not punishment.....ITS RESPONSIBILITY AND ACCOUNTABILITY for the safety of YOUR kids.
melissa December 18, 2012 at 04:15 pm
Just do not see how these measures improve security. Hire expert security professionals to make recommendations. These amateur knee jurking measures are a joke to a very serious security issue and should not satisfy parents at all
JBurrell December 18, 2012 at 05:23 pm
EJW I could not have said it any better myself! I will never criticize any of the points that everyone here has made as they are all valid points. There is no one solution to this problem. Unfortunately the one inflicting the harm is the only one who had the benefit of a plan. Please parents let's not criticize each others points of view and let's not become the people who will sue because the school could not prevent these situations from happening. BTW there is no national or state plan for schools for active shooter drills. These drills are best planned between the schools and the local police departments that will respond. Also contact your local police departments to remind them that they need to keep their staff trained and familiarized with the lay outs of the schools, both public and private, in their jurisdictions. I am somewhat relieved hearing what other parents concerns are and I thank you for making me feel that I am not alone in being concerned about my child's safety.
ejw December 18, 2012 at 05:31 pm
they may seem to be "knee-jurk" reactions, but that is only because they were implemented very suddenly. Many of them are typical to what you would see in other districts. Replacing the entry system to an electronic badge-controlled variety not only makes it difficult for those to enter w/out a key, but also electronically monitors which staff members are/aren't in the building. Locking classroom doors from anyone entering from the outside is not something that should shock anyone. The doors to my office do this, and I don't feel "imprisoned" or punished. It will not stop a determined person, but there's a good chance it could slow them down for that precious minute before the police arrive. Security guards...armed or not, will still serve a better purpose that unmanned hallways. Highly trained ex-military personnel are expensive, and guaranteed not to be in the budget. Plus, if they are armed, like many of you have said they "better be", how does that not frighten the children even more? You think your kids will be scarred for life from not getting a holiday party...but are okay with ARMED GUARDS??
Not all of these changes were necessary to implement immediately; best practice would have been to make a public announcement of upcoming changes, then base the final decision on the reaction from the community. I do, however, think that all of these changes came with the absolute greatest intention...to ensure the safety of your children.
Rhonda Reed-Slaughter December 18, 2012 at 05:39 pm
I don't have any doubt Mitchem and the district's security have our kids best interest at heart. But sometimes the best reaction is no reaction, at least for a while. A slow and deliberate plan is the best route. Gathering input from the community, including parents, religious members, police, etc. is also important.
More importantly, prayer should be at the top of the list.
ejw December 18, 2012 at 06:33 pm
No, prayer should not be a priority at all. Admin, parents and kids can pray all they want at home, but you can't measure results from prayer. And if you're willing to put the safety of thousands of children at stake by focusing first on prayer, you're more dangerous than the guy pulling the trigger. God didn't save those 20 kids in CT, what makes you think "he" will save others if this happens again?
Religion has nothing to do with ensuring public safety; take the kids to private school if that's what you're after.
Rhonda Reed-Slaughter December 18, 2012 at 08:37 pm
I disagree. God and prayer should always play a role in our lives. If one chooses to ignore the significance, it's your choice. I'm not one to judge.
However, I do hope VVSD would consider a town hall mtg and invite the community to join in a conversation about school security and the safety of our children. Plus, having religious leaders there to provide prayer and support can only benefit those in attendance. This is not the time to get angry, frightened, and/or lock down our schools. Take the time needed to develop a logical plan.
kay December 18, 2012 at 09:23 pm
These reactions make me sick to my stomach. Having classroom doors locked is a bad thing? That’s how many lives were saved in CT, by locking the doors and hiding! These same parents that complain about stricter rules are the same parents that would complain if, god forbid, an active shooter did enter their child’s school. Who would you have to blame then? No plan is perfect but if it means I get to tuck my child into bed every night and tell them I love them every day, then by all means go with it. Keep my kids safe and educated, by any means necessary. And if your child has concerns, you as a parent should reassure them that they are safe and that these measures are there to protect them.
john salazar December 18, 2012 at 11:10 pm
You're gonna love this. My 6 year old was suspended for 2 days this week because he pointed his finger at friends while on the playground. (making gun gestures)
What does a 6 YO learn from 2 days off? Can they even understand that they can't pretend to shoot guns? I can see a 9yo or older understanding but c'mon a 6yo?
Not okay December 19, 2012 at 01:41 pm
No, I don't love this at all and thanks to your 6 year old there are now 20 some other 6 year olds who now know the F-word. You may want to start considering some kind of discipline instead of undermining the best interest of the rest of the students.
john salazar December 19, 2012 at 06:10 pm
I think its ignorant of you to assume or imply that the actions of a 6 year old child, one who had no knowledge of the current event had anything to do with what happened.
Kids play cops and robbers all the time and its never inappropriate. Kids learn such words from friends and sometimes even family so to freak out and punish a child so excessively does nothing to improve on what has happened. You are a POS for implying that.
Mickey December 20, 2012 at 06:42 pm
John, may I ask what POS stands for?
john salazar December 21, 2012 at 01:09 am
piece of poop

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Bolingbrook Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kristie June 13, 2013 at 10:20 am
I can't imagine what a customer could do that would cause a cashier to yell at them. Can you expandRead More a little on the situation? I shop there often but generally use the self-scan. There is one cashier that works that area that can be quite rude. It took me a minute to get my ID out and she went off on me. Sorry I wasn't as prepared as I should be but it isn't often that a 45+ woman is asked for ID.