.

CSY Bother? Crime Scene Tech In Peterson Case Saw No Point In Collecting Evidence

The evidence tech called to Kathleen Savio's death scene figured he could go back and check around later if it looked like he needed to.

The Illinois State Police evidence tech sent to Kathleen Savio's death scene left without collecting a single piece of evidence.

"Our plan at the time, because we weren't exactly sure what happened to her" was to wait until after an autopsy was performed before deciding whether or not to return to Savio's home and look for evidence, said the tech, state police Sgt. Robert Deel.

Deel was one of three witnesses to testify Tuesday in the murder trial of former Bolingbrook cop Drew Peterson, who was arrested in May 2009 on charges he drowned Savio, his third wife.

Savio was found dead in March 2004. The state police insisted she perished in a freak bathtub accident and stuck with that theory until Peterson's next wife, Stacy Peterson, mysteriously vanished in October 2007. The state police—with the exception of Deel—then declared Savio was the victim of a homicide and eventually arrested Peterson.

Deel testified Tuesday that he still believes Savio was the victim of a freak bathtub accident.

Stacy remains missing. The state police named Peterson the sole suspect in their investigation of her whereabouts but have yet to charge him with harming her.

Deel said Tuesday he saw no evidence of a struggle or "anything out of place" in Savio's home, but also noted he did not look very hard. He said he walked around her house but did not check to see if windows were locked. He also did not venture throughout most of the home's interior besides Savio's bedroom and bathroom.

When shown photographs—which he took—of the large, red injuries on Savio's buttocks, Deel called them "typical bruising" and added, "They would have been on (her) body from day-to-day life."

He also said they could be indicative of a skin condition.

When shown a photograph, also taken by him, of the deep cut to Savio's scalp, Deel said he was unaware of its severity.

"I knew she had some type of injury there," he said. "I didn't do a more thorough investigation."

Deel also said that during the autopsy conducted on Savio, the consensus among those present was that she died in an accident. He also said the pathologist who performed the autopsy, Dr. Bryan Mitchell, stood by that opinion until his death in March 2010.

But later in his testimony Deel said Mitchell did change his mind, deciding Savio's death should have been classified as "undetermined." And then Deel appeared to contradict himself once more, saying that Mitchell, at the time of his own death, believed Savio's case was "not a homicide."

Before Deel took the stand, Will County Deputy Coroner Michael VanOver was called to testify.

VanOver told how it was Deel who decided not to follow the mandated protocol for suspicious deaths and homicides.

"I asked (Deel) if they thought there was something wrong here and they
said, 'No,'" VanOver testified.

After Deel, Bolingbrook police Lt. James Coughlin was called to tell about a conversation he and another Bolingbrook officer had with Peterson in a Will County Courthouse corridor just weeks before Savio turned up dead.

Coughlin said he and Officer Richard Treece were standing by the courthouse elevators when Peterson came down the hall with his divorce attorney, Alexander Beck, and Savio's attorney, Harry Smith, only a few feet behind.

The two lawyers were laughing, Coughlin said, and Treece told Peterson, "They look happy."

"That's because they're getting all my money," Coughlin said Peterson replied.

Peterson then said, "My life would be easier if she was just dead or died," according to Coughlin.

Coughlin tried to tell this to state police investigators when they were at his department in 2004 but they did not question him about it or put his statement in a report, he said.

After Stacy disappeared, the FBI made a report on Coughlin's statement but apparently bungled all of his story, he said, relating that the lawyers were "laughing hysterically" inside a courtroom.

Coughlin said he informed the state's attorney's office about the discrepancies in the FBI report two years ago. Now Peterson's attorneys are trying to have all of Coughlin's testimony thrown out since prosecutors failed to disclose that he informed them of the differences.

Judge Edward Burmila will decide the Coughlin matter Wednesday morning.

Also expected on Wednesday is testimony from the lead investigator in the 2004 Savio probe, retired state police Sgt. Patrick Collins.

Robert August 08, 2012 at 02:12 AM
CSY Bother? Crime Scene Tech In Peterson Case Saw No Point In Collecting Evidence The key word here is "EVIDENCE" . Now we are getting somewhere....there was no collection of "evidence"....therefore no case. And there should be no do-overs. Throw this case out and quit wasting the taxpayers money on cases with "no evidence".
Francis M. Regan August 08, 2012 at 02:27 AM
By not properly processing the scene , they missed out on evidence possibly of another suspect besides Peterson.
Laura V August 08, 2012 at 03:08 AM
What a shame. This bastard will probably walk cause of state police not taking care of this.
Lori August 08, 2012 at 01:25 PM
Agree totally Robert, Francis Regan & Laura. The only good thing about this trial is that possibly some lesson will be learned. All the first responders all the way to the judges must follow the law when doing their jobs...friend, co-worker, family envolved doesn't matter. EVIDENCE will prove Guilt or Innocent (last I checked you are still presumed innocent until proven otherwise in America). I may not agree in my personal opinion but I still respect the laws that give a person a fair trial. In this case I do believe the judge is doing his best to hold a Fair trial.
Francis M. Regan August 08, 2012 at 02:05 PM
Lori now you are going to awaken the the sleeping tiger , watchful eye the legal expert and he will tell us the real opinion.
walt scherff August 08, 2012 at 06:33 PM
good lord - what a bunch of nothing -- Peterson said he'd be better off if she were dead -- now just think a minute - of all the guys you know that went thru a divorce- and some ladies too- that didn't say the same thing at some time during the divorce process- and especially to a couple friends while shooting the bull -- think the county is going to find this to be a very expensive fishing trip........
Tim rice August 08, 2012 at 06:54 PM
Yes, absolutely.
Bindy August 08, 2012 at 08:11 PM
Can't believe how our prosecutors are getting outclassed by the defense lawyers. Forget the evidence for a minute (unlike the prosecutors who forgot about it all together) I think the jury looses trust in lawyers who try to sneek in improper evidence because they have a no case. Here they have been caught in the act three times in a week by the judge. They should be honest and follow the rules and the jury might believe them more. Could you imagine how it would feel to watch the government do this to you or a member of your family? No matter how noble-minded they may be, government overreaching hurts all of us and should not be tolerated.
Jim Short August 08, 2012 at 11:40 PM
would that other suspect be OJ???
Jim Short August 08, 2012 at 11:41 PM
How can you mention other suspects and accident in the same breath???
Jim Short August 09, 2012 at 01:50 AM
walt, how many of these people have a dead spouse a few weeks later? If they do then yes, it should be investigated.
Martin August 09, 2012 at 05:02 AM
"Peterson Said 'Life Would be Easier if she was Just Dead'"...Jeez on that statement alone I know multiple guys (and gals) that would be on trial for Attempted Murder. Lots of folks have said that, especially during a nasty divorce.
Linda Brown August 14, 2012 at 12:03 PM
why does the Judge not tell the jury about StacyPetersons being missing?Also drew washed Kathys clothes in his wash machine and had Stacy LIE and say he was home. He is slick as who would not pick up clean clothes when he threw them away. Why was HE on the investagation of his ex wife???

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »