.
News Alert
Truck Driver Charged In I-55 Crash That Killed 4

New Peterson Attorney Hopes to Overturn Conviction, Cites Mistakes by Defense

A Naperville attorney accuses Joel Brodsky of forcing Peterson into pre-trial publicity and threatening to leak information if he was fired.

A Naperville attorney filed documents in Will County court Tuesday asserting he is now representing Drew Peterson and he hopes to overturn Peterson's conviction based on mistakes made by the defense team. 

John Paul Carroll accuses lead Peterson defense attorney Joel Brodsky of lying about his courtroom experience, forcing Peterson into pre-trial publicity and threatening to leak information about Peterson if he was fired, according to the Chicago Tribune

READ MORE: 

  • Will Drew Peterson Bounce Brodsky?
  • Drew Peterson Loses Another Lawyer
  • Lawyer Fight! Drew Peterson Attorney Draws Line in Sand

“Attorney Brodsky had lied to Mr. Peterson on a number of occasions and when Mr. Peterson discovered the lies and talked about possibly discharging attorney Brodsky and retaining other counsel, attorney Brodsky indicated that in the event he was discharged, he would be ethically bound to publicly reveal some things that were discussed between him and Mr. Peterson,” the motion states, according to the Chicago Tribune

To overturn the conviction based on a claim of "ineffective counsel," "Peterson must show that Brodsky’s representation fell below acceptable standards and that the outcome might have been different because of it," the Tribune reported

Brodsky and fellow Peterson defense team member Steve Greenberg have been embroiled in a month-long, bitter battle of words since Peterson was found guilty of murdering his third wife, Kathleen Savio.

Peterson first sent a letter to Greenberg telling him he was fired. Brodsky then took to Facebook and penned a bizarre attack on Greenberg. In his 404-word rant, Brodsky blamed Greenberg for losing the case.

Greenberg responded with a 15-page, footnoted letter to Brodsky in which he claimed the guilty verdict was essentially based on evidence presented by a witness Brodsky chose to call and question himself.

The move backfired, as the witness, Wheaton attorney Harry Smith, recalled the time Peterson's fourth wife, Stacy Peterson, told him how Peterson killed Savio. After the trial ended, jurors said the guilty verdict hinged on Smith's testimony.

Editor's note: Editor Joe Hosey contributed to this report. 

Anna Hultin October 10, 2012 at 01:14 PM
Drew never thought he would be found guility...."I can kill you and make it look like an accident"...it was homicide...30 to 60 yrs...not his fault...definitely the attorneys..he is panicking....he said on nightline ...I don't want to be alone....karma Drew ....you have your memories...
kilo charlie October 10, 2012 at 03:01 PM
the bufoonery just continues. to say that joel brodskys performance in court was below acceptable standards is the understatement of the year. it's very difficult to get a case overturned for that reason. "brodsky forced drew into all the pretrial publicity" LOL. no body had a gun to drews head when he was outside his house all the time joking it up with the media. justice has been served.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »