.

Drew Peterson Juror Deliberations to Start Wednesday

The prosecution and defense in the Drew Peterson murder trial presented their closing arguments Tuesday.

Updated 5:02 p.m. 

Judge Edward Burmila is calling a halt to the day's proceedings. 

Closing arguments lasted longer than Burmila had anticipated. Deliberations by the jury will start Wednesday. 

Updated 4:20 p.m. 

State's Attorney James Glasgow made the rebuttal argument for the prosecution's case.

"When you put all this evidence together, it's solid, it's real, and it proves Drew Peterson killed Kathleen Savio in cold blood," Glasgow said.

Glasgow countered the attack on prosecution witnesses leveled by defense attorney Joseph "Shark" Lopez. Glasgow also said the prosecution's case includes scientific, circumstantial and hearsay evidence.

The state's attorney pointed out that jurors don't have to conclude tha each element of the prosecution's case exceeds the level of reasonable doubt.

He told the jurors they must merely find the case as a whole has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt. "You can take a stick and snap it," Glasgow said. "But if you take 50 sticks, he said, they cannot be broken."

Updated 2:36 p.m. 

Defense attorney Joseph "Shark" Lopez started his closing argument by telling the jury they could ignore the testimony of witnesses who recounted Drew Peterson's threats to third wife Kathleen Savio, and then he spent about an hour attacking their integrity.

"If you can't prove it's a homicide, who cares what (the Rev.) Neil Schori says?" Said Lopez. "Who cares what (Savio's sister) Anna Doman says? Who cares what (attorney) Harry Smith said?"

Lopez saved his most burning vitriol for Smith, whom he referred to as "Smiley" and continually flashed on a large screen an image of a grinning purple Cheshire cat whenever he spoke of him.

But then Smith, who was called as a defense witness and questioned by Peterson attorney Joel Brodsky, may have done the most damage to the accused wife-killer's case.

Lopez also attacked forensic pathologist Michael Baden, calling him the "Show Biz Doc" and showing a picture of the Hollywood sign when he spoke of him.

Lopez was also critical in his assessment of not only Savio's friends and relatives, but of the dead Peterson wife herself.

Original story 

Assistant State's Attorney Chris Koch just finished his closing argument, hitting on nearly every high point of the prosecution's 35 witnesses and criticizing that of the doctors called to testify for the defense.

Koch repeatedly called on the jury to use their "common sense and life experiences" when reaching a verdict. He also hammered home that Drew Peterson "entered that home with the intent to kill" Kathleen Savio.

"He held her down," Koch said. He forced her to inhale water." 

Koch also repeated damning statements others claimed Savio made to them about Peterson planning or threatening to kill her. 

"I'm going to kill you," Koch repeated. "You're not going to make it through the divorce settlement. You're not going to get the pension. You're not going to get the kids."

Koch also spoke of witnesses testifying how Savio told them Peterson said to her, "I could kill you and make it look like an accident," and "I can kill you and make you disappear."

Koch recalled how a minister and divorce attorney both testified that Peterson' fourth wife, Stacy Peterson, told them details of Peterson allegedly killing Savio.

The minister, Neil Schori, told of Stacy relating Peterson's actions and plan to cover up the Savio slaying, Koch said. The attorney, Harry Smith, said Stacy told him how Peterson killed Savio.

Tony Filippelli September 04, 2012 at 07:22 PM
And it's all Heresay, which is inadmissable. This is setting a very dangerous precedent. This judge should be censured or possibly disbarred for allowing it to happen.
Pro Life Crusader + September 04, 2012 at 07:45 PM
Hearsay sucks to he used against anyone and everyone at any trial, regardless who they are!
TheCheese September 04, 2012 at 08:58 PM
Drew Peterson should be injected with truth serum. It's a much cheaper approach and less media.
Jeff Garcia September 04, 2012 at 09:07 PM
If hearsay will be allowed now in the courts. What trouble can someone who dislikes you get you in? There is no justice!
Jerry September 04, 2012 at 09:10 PM
"Use your common sense and life experiences" Translation: We have no factual evidence the Peterson (or anyone for that matter) actually killed Savio so we need you to decide 'well, he must have done it'. I think he is guilty as hell and there is not a chance in the world I would vote to convict him based on this sham of a trial.
Pro Life Crusader + September 04, 2012 at 09:34 PM
Hey I heard that so and so killed Jimmy Hoffa, so go and arrest the so and so person.
Watchful Eye September 04, 2012 at 09:40 PM
Jeff Garcia - Hearsay is not new. It's Called Rule 803, Exceptions to Hearsay. It's allowed in courts.
Tom Smith September 04, 2012 at 09:49 PM
Its OJ Simpson all over again!!!!! Another waste of time and money. Personal opinion he is guilty but hearsay cant and wont convict!!!
Pro Life Crusader + September 04, 2012 at 10:07 PM
@Tom Smith look at how stupid the jurors were on the O.J. and Casey Anthony trials and the idiots acquitted the both of them and they had more evidence on both of them than they have on Drew. So jurors can do stupid things when it comes to verdicts.
john bruno September 04, 2012 at 10:23 PM
It is not all hearsay and some hearsay is admissible. If you don't know what you're talking about, Tony.....Say nothing and listen and watch.
Patience is a Virtue September 04, 2012 at 10:23 PM
WOW.......someone is nervous..... Heresay is words from a person that can't defend themself or is not around anymore.....Not when they are just missing.....Isn't Stacy just missing????????? Plus a lawyer has it documented what Stacy said....So isn't that evidence? Not heresay? Clarify to me what exactly is the "heresay" and stop muddying up everything so it appears as an injustice...Frankly the injustice is already been done and still trying to be covered up....Midnight is almost here for Cinderella Folks.
Pro Life Crusader + September 04, 2012 at 10:38 PM
Hearsay is nothing ,but desperation and junk evidence.
BooChar September 04, 2012 at 10:48 PM
I think The Patch should edit out rude and obnoxious comments. These types if comments do not express the free right of speech . The comments expressed from some show that their choice of speaking about this topic is self-righteous, belligerent, and threatening to others. If these people speak like this on an Internet Forum, imagine what they are like to work with!
Pro Life Crusader + September 04, 2012 at 11:25 PM
BooChar these comments here are free speech, as long as there's not profanity. Also whats rude? Anyone can say what they please about the trial and their opinions on evidence.
Patience is a Virtue September 05, 2012 at 12:22 AM
RULES OF EVIDENCE ARTICLE VIII. HEARSAY Rule 804. Hearsay Exceptions; Declarant Unavailable (2) Statement under belief of impending death. In a prosecution for homicide or in a civil action or proceeding, a statement made by a declarant while believing that his or her death was imminent, concerning the cause or circumstances of what the declarant believed to be impending death.
BooChar September 05, 2012 at 12:31 AM
That's the problem...anyone can say what they PLEASE...without doing so in a polite manner.
BooChar September 05, 2012 at 12:33 AM
Just be polite... Without offending anyone else who is posting
Marc Kaminski September 05, 2012 at 12:40 AM
Desperation on who? The criminal? It sure is something its the person whom died only HOPE...especially in this case. Hopefully when the verdict is in....you will be enlightened....Either way I know we will read what you think....Try to get some sleep tonight....
Vicky Deluca September 05, 2012 at 06:10 PM
Did you forget about DREWS LAW? THe law that states in certain cases heresay is ADMISSABLE!! Gets your facts straight!
Vicky Deluca September 05, 2012 at 06:10 PM
You fail to realize that this new law is for certain and special cases...It is not for every case!
Vicky Deluca September 05, 2012 at 06:11 PM
I think its pretty safe to say he did murder her just like his other wife only that time he couldn't do an accident twice in a row!!

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something