.
Feedback

VVSD Budget is $17.2M More than Last Year

The Valley View School District 365U passed its 2012-2013 fiscal year budget Monday night.

The Valley View School District 365U school board passed its 2012-2013 budget with a unanimous vote Monday night. 

The $275 million budget is $17.2 million more than the 2011-2012 budget. School officials said the addition of all-day kindergarten to the district accounts for $13.5 million of that increase. 

Salaries and benefits account for 71.7 percent of the budget, according to Gary Grizaffi, assistant superintendent of administrative services.

Salaries are up 3 percent in the budget to $136,613,903 (49.7 percent of the total budget). Benefits are up 8.1 percent to $60,328,539 (22 percent of the total budget). Grazaffi said there was a net decrease of 7.93 positions from FY12 to FY13. 

Loss in revenue 

Three primary revenue sources for the school district decreased $4.2 million, according to Grizaffi: 

  • $1.7 million in general state aid 
  • $1.2 million in transportation reimbursement 
  • $1.29 million in corporate personal property replacement tax 

General state aid has decreased to $1,060 per student, or $18.7 million. That's a decrease of $1.7 million than the prior year, or $96 per student. The district was receiving about $1,500 per student four years ago, Grizaffi said. 

Cut services or spend reserve funds 

Grizaffi said the district has two choices when revenue isn't covering expenses -- to cut services or to draw money from its reserves to make up the difference (to "use its rainy fund because it's raining," as Grizaffi put it). 

"This board has said collectively that we have a decent fund balance built over the years," Grizaffi said. "We're doing the best we can to maintain the level of programming." 

100 days of operations 

That being said, Grizaffi has recommended the district maintain enough money at the end of the fiscal year to run the district for at least 90 days. 

In the current budget, operating funds stand at $243,706,271. With a total budget of $274,611,153, the district is using money from its fund balance to cover the difference. When all the bills are paid and the fiscal year draws to a close, the school district will be left with enough money leftover to function for 100 days. 

Last fiscal year, the district was left with enough operating reserves to function for 165 days. Taking any more money out of the district's fund balance will "take us to an area we have not been for the last five years," Grizaffi said. 

Getting to a low point balance of 30 days would be a "precarious situation." 

Grizaffi said school districts receive the bulk of their revenue in June and September, unlike villages or park districts which receive more consistent funding throughout the year. 

What about teachers' contract negotiations? 

One resident asked how the budget could be passed when teachers' contract negotiations are ongoing. Officials said they are required by state law to pass a budget by a certain date. The approved budget contains assumed salary increases for teachers. If the number is higher or lower than that assumption, the budget can be amended. 

A taxpayer speaks out 

A woman who identified herself as "Josephine" said increased property taxes are becoming too much for homeowners in the Valley View district. Josephine said when she first moved to Bolingbrook her property taxes were $1,700. They are now $5,500. 

"I'm worried I will not be able to live in (my) house anymore because taxes are going so high," she said. "You see families that have to get second jobs (to pay their taxes). There are kids on the street." 

Josephine urged the board to live within its means. 

"You have to stop treating homeowners as a cow that will always give you that sweet milk," she said. "We have a family and we have lives, too." 

School Board President Steven Quigley said the district does its best to address that problem. 

"That's the problem we face," Quigley said. "We want to provide a quality education for our kids, keep people who are empty nester happy, keep people with kids happy..."

Board Member Rick Gougis said the county assessors are also to blame for higher taxes by over-assessing homes. The assessed value of a home is factured into the property tax bill. 

"I know I can't sell my house for the amount the assessor says my house is worth," he said. 

SLAG September 25, 2012 at 11:06 am
I agree w/Josephine; I am an empty nester and both my pension and social security are "fixed" incomes for me. My taxes are approximately $5000 and the subdivision in which I live looks pretty similar like the slums. My "growing old" goal has been to never be a burden on my adult children and so far, I've been pretty much able to stick to that goal, but if my property taxes keep going up, I have a real concern.
Mike September 25, 2012 at 11:57 am
I hope the new budget factors in doctoral tuition reimbursement. Or was that a one-time only thing?
Mrs K September 25, 2012 at 12:08 pm
All of the sudden they want to provide our children with a quality education? BULLCRAP! Are they telling us for the last ten years, that a quality education was not on their agenda?
We are paying a bloated administrative staff top-dollar salaries and in return many of our children are not fully prepared for college. I'm so disgusted with the VVSD, that I want to move to another school district.
Mrs K September 25, 2012 at 12:15 pm
@Slag
I feel for you. You are paying high taxes on something you do or your family do not use, and... here is the kicker - VVSD past and current failures are having a negative effect on your property value. THAT SUCKS!
Mrs K September 25, 2012 at 12:19 pm
*You are paying high taxes on something you or your family do not use
PKR September 25, 2012 at 12:42 pm
Its time to open charter schools. The budget has gotten too big and the quality too low in the high schools.
my opinion September 25, 2012 at 01:22 pm
What we need in the state of Illinois is "Proposition 13"
http://www.californiataxdata.com/pdf/Prop13.pdf Unfortunately this would never pass in Illinois. Imagine your assessed value never going up as long as you own your home. Real Estate taxes couldn't go up more than 2% a year (your assessment doesn't change). I realize California did this back in 1978, before they became the "left coast", and you know that our state legislation would never let this pass, but we can dream can't we?.
Michael September 25, 2012 at 03:21 pm
I am an aide in this district.The increases in insurance premiums have a considerable effect on my meager wages. Specifically, an extra $600 a year for someone making $45000 and up looks a lot better than for someone making $27000. Money isn't everything, but, at the very least, I want my real wages to stagnate; losing money is not acceptable. While inflation expectations remain low at around 1.5% per year, my future costs still rise roughly 4.6% over the next 3 years. The proposed contract would yield around a 3% increase. 3% < 4.6%. I will not willingly enter into a belt-tightening agreement with partners who fail to do the same. This administration has bloated itself with multiple new positions over the past two years; each of which brings many times the cost of the paraprofessionals and teachers we've lost. To me, a Board of Education that lavishes a 33% bonus on an, as yet unproven, chief administrator is in no position to ask me to cut my expenses for the good of the district.
Michael September 25, 2012 at 03:22 pm
The Board of Education went on a spending spree with their new administration. Both with the new Ad Center positions and, also, on new textbook programs, full-day kindergarten [which included some serious lay-out in capital for building additions], the Odyssey Program, and the new computers that are needed to implement that program. Hell, the district purchased a whole new 7th grade math textbook across middle schools, which they dropped a year later. So, for them to then turn at us and say, “You guys, you’re the ones that are costing the district too much money” is just too much bull for me to swallow.
Why So Serious? September 25, 2012 at 10:52 pm
I am an individual who has come to grips, unfortunately, with the price of taxes (in a few short years mine have gone up over $700), and I can understand, not accept, the cost if I know it is being used wisely. I believe with many taxpayers that it is not just the amount of taxes paid, but also the return investment. If my taxes continue to go up, primarily due to the district, there should be a return investment.
I cannot argue with an all-day kindergarten. I cannot argue with having smaller class sizes. I cannot argue with giving our teachers benefits and tuition reimbursement to further their education. I can argue with a district office that is disturbingly growing in comparison to other districts out size in an attempt to mask administrative failures. I can argue with programs that are aiming to improve student scores as a failed attempt to create and implement a valid curriculum. I can argue a $66,000 check/reimbursement/amendment/whatever. I am more than willing to write a check to better the school system, but there has to be consistent and valid evidence of this happening. Inconsistency, whether positive or negative, is still what it is: inconsistent.
Indy September 25, 2012 at 10:58 pm
VVSD offered the teachers a contract with a small salary increase and large increase in insurance cost. So basically the right hand gave and the left took it away. In the mean time administrative positions continue to be added, expenditures on new curriculum brought in by all these new administrators goes up and then of course there was the cost of the all day kindergarten. So in order to pay for all these things I guess it is OK to sacrifice the teachers. They really don't do anything anyway right?
Why So Serious? September 25, 2012 at 11:44 pm
Indy, I agree. I heard about that contract and it is beyond sad especially when they created more administrative positions this summer. We are all about accountability and while there does need to be some with teachers, it seems as if there is none for administrators.
Tyler d September 25, 2012 at 11:53 pm
Since the board already passed the budget, nothing really we can do now but pose a challenge for vvsd to prove that their services to our children is worth the bitter pill of paying more in property taxes. It is just annoying that
the scores that our school system got is borderline mediocre...
Indy September 26, 2012 at 01:49 am
Michael I completely agree with you. Bolingbrook citizens should look more closely at the expenditures made by VVSD. I am all for money well spent to help student achievement but inflated administrative salaries and curriculum purchased without thouroughly investigating it's effectiveness and then abandoned is not money well spent. The board and administrators need to be more accountable for their spending and not lay it all at the feet of the teachers and paraprofessionals.
Clearwater September 28, 2012 at 11:22 pm
I am so glad a few people see what has happened administratively. I was concerned the public would be negative against teachers saying no to the contract proposal. On the vvsd website anyone can see the "Administrator Compensation Report". From 2010 to 2011 there was an approximate increase of over $1 million in administrator salaries and they went from 72 to 86 positions. Anyone can look and find this info themselves. Wow, do you know how many aides and/or teachers could be hired for $1,000,000?!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Bolingbrook Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Kristie June 13, 2013 at 10:20 am
I can't imagine what a customer could do that would cause a cashier to yell at them. Can you expandRead More a little on the situation? I shop there often but generally use the self-scan. There is one cashier that works that area that can be quite rude. It took me a minute to get my ID out and she went off on me. Sorry I wasn't as prepared as I should be but it isn't often that a 45+ woman is asked for ID.