patching...
Breaking: Armed Robbers Lead Car Chase to Bolingbrook Near Weber and Boughton Roads »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Wrongful Death

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Drew Peterson Lawyer Wants Wrongful Death Case Iced Until After Appeal

The attorney defending convicted wife-killer Drew Peterson against a wrongful death civil suit wants a summary judgment refused and the case held until after the criminal appeal is finished.

A judge ruled Drew Peterson likely killed his third wife, Kathleen Savio, and a jury found him guilty of murdering her. But the attorney defending the disgraced former Bolingbrook cop against a wrongful death lawsuit says that's not enough to find Peterson responsible for Savio's death. Peterson's lawyer, John Heiderscheidt, responded last week to a motion for summary judgment by calling for case to be put on hold. Heiderscheidt, who took over after former Peterson attorney Joel Brodsky left both the civil and criminal cases, asked "that the matter be permanently stayed pending the outcome of Mr. Peterson's appellate case." Heiderscheidt also wants the motion for summary judgment to be denied. Heiderscheidt acknowledged that retired Will …

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Top Prosecutor Wants to Stay Off Witness Stand in Drew Peterson Case

Will County State's Attorney James Glasgow is trying to derail a plan by convicted wife-killer Drew Peterson's lawyers to put him on the witness stand.

The man who won the Drew Peterson case wants no part of taking the witness stand at a hearing next week to decide whether the convicted wife-killer should get a new murder trial. Will County State's Attorney James Glasgow filed court papers asking Judge Edward Burmila to bar Peterson's lawyers from calling him as a witness. The motion says Peterson's lawyers revealed their plans to call Glasgow as a witness nearly two weeks ago, but that the state's attorney should not have to testify. "A prosecutor, judge or news reporter is a 'special witness,'" the motion says. And if Peterson's lawyers want to get any of those kind of people on the stand, they must disclose what the witness is expected to say, why the testimony would be relevant, and …

Comment_arrow

Ernie Knight

1:34 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013

When the Illinois Appellate Court ruled on admissible heresay in this case, they specifically REJECTED the new law. All heresay admitted was based on existing statute and case law. Read the Chicago Tribune's account. Others failed to go into detail and explain that.   more ›

Got a Hot Tip?
 
 

Videos